Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | undersuit's commentslogin

These children have experienced LLMs for a much larger part of their lives than you and at a very formative time. I'm going to listen.

For a larger proportion, but more or less the same absolute. Plus they have far fewer skills and relatable web of experiences to synthesize what AI is.

Yes they more rapidly synthesize new information, but they also lack the crystalized wisdom to apply judgement, cross domain expertise etc.


Only way to correctly vote on your ballot. Blow away hanging chads

Why should non-citizens be excluded from voting? If the community they live in makes a democratic decision they should be included.

Simply because it's ripe for abuse. I would never expected to vote as a non permanent resident, any place I live.

I think otherwise. Let's put it to a vote. Hope you're a citizen.

That system is ripe for abuse. The presidential election is usually (not always) decided by a few swing-states. It sure wouldn't be hard to fly a bunch of people in for a few days, put them up in hotels and feed them, give 'em a little bit of cash, so they go vote, as one example. So now you have to prove they live in, as you said, a community.

If you had said 'immigrants' instead of non-citizens you would have a stronger point. I don't have an issue with non-citizen immigrants voting. Part of the challenge is a.) proving someone exists and b.) proving they live in the district in which they voted. How do you solve this? Voter registration.

Ignoring all that, voting is both a right and privilege of citizenship. This can be revoked. As an example, convicted felons cannot vote.

The 15th Amendment says (note the word citizens):

> The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The 19th Amendment then gave women the right to vote:

> The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

So, it is very much a law to be a citizen in order to vote.

As an aside, what if a non-citizen of an EU country was vacationing for a month in said EU country. Should they be able to vote? Of course not.


> It sure wouldn't be hard to fly a bunch of people in for a few days

I didn't say no registration. Every US state has a residency requirement before you can register to vote. Get out of here with your disingenious hyperbolics.

>So, it is very much a law to be a citizen in order to vote.

Oh no I'm proposing changing the law, your quotes say nothing about limiting a non-citizen's ability to vote. I never argued about a right to vote for non-citizens. I took a very limited stance.


Because of United States law.

Only since 1996, and even then only Federally.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_Immigration_Reform_and...

Maybe we can ask SCOTUS to overthrow it on the "history and tradition" test Dobbs & Bruen recently (ironically) created.


>Only since 1996, and even then only Federally.

States have banned noncitizen voting for statewide elections for a century.

"While federal law does not prohibit noncitizens from voting in state or local elections, no state has allowed noncitizens to vote in statewide elections since Arkansas became the last state to outlaw noncitizen voting in state elections in 1926."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-citizen_suffrage_in_the_Un...


Yep, they can do that.

Nothing says the 1996 law can't be undone (as it's not an amendment), and states can permit noncitizen voting outside of the Federal context if they feel like it. That's Federalism for you.


The iron-clad unchanging US law. Is it against the law for a city to let non-citizens vote on city proposals?

[flagged]


That's a dodge; they said "non-citizens", not "illegal aliens".

A reputable vendor resells a product they've modified as unmodified?

> A reputable vendor resells a product they've modified as unmodified?

I wouldn't mind buying a 16GB board even though the official models at most ship with 8gb.

I'd even wouldn't mind buying the kit and taking a stab at resoldering it myself.

I mean, think about it. what is the whole point of a raspberry pi?

Even if you might not, why would your opinion prevent others from doing what they want with their hardware?


So buy from a vendor that offers the 16GB modification and runs their own hardware support.

You can still solder your own 16GB and you can do your own support.

Maybe if the Rasp Pi was an unassembled kit "the whole point" would make sense.

You can do what ever you want with your hardware. Have fun. Other people don't have to support you.


It's not bricked.

It does boot.

It's not bricked retroactively from what I've read.

https://github.com/raspberrypi/rpi-eeprom/issues/761

If someone gets updated in the wild (like this person did without realizing they had a counterfeit board), they'll fail to boot.


Consider that that happened a year ago and this submission may be about the fix.

The "fix" in the thread is just not updating ever again.

There is no fix that can be suggested in that thread. Pi LTD doesn't have the modified RAM Pis to test their firmware against nor should they be required to support modified hardware.

The fix is turning the detection of the modified ram from a boot failure into a warning and log output, then tell users asking for support that they don't have support for Pis that were modified by third parties.

Instead we get restrictions on all users because some users buy stuff from random marketplaces online?

I don't know why you're suggesting the fix is that they offer support for 3rd modded RAM.


>I don't know why you're suggesting the fix is that they offer support for 3rd modded RAM.

I'm not.


Yeah that information mattered when someone wrote it down, not when the LLM regurgitated an approximation.

The regurgitated approximation can matter just as much depending on what results it accomplishes. If I somehow make money out of this, then it's mission accomplished. Arguably, they might even matter more than my artisanal hand crafted software projects which never paid me a living wage.

Making money matters? Weird.

How do they have no community ties? Did you drive the children 20 miles away from home?


How well does the average parent know the other parents and children on the first day dropping their kid off at daycare?


On the first day? Barely, though in "good" daycares, you usually have a connection because placement is competitive and you got in through nepotism.

After a couple months? If you don't know the other kids by name and some other parents, you may have a bad daycare full of people who do not care.

My sister ran a fairly renowned daycare for over a decade. She ended up the caretaker for the children of many friends, and gained many friends of the children she helped raise. The daycare was a massive part of their community. It allowed the parents to function in modern society while ensuring their child was in the care of, essentially, an expert.


How well does the average person know their neighbors when they move to a new place? Maybe if you had a routine where you and your children meet other families that live close to you... hmmmm


I'm not a parent but my niece and nephew (different parents) both go to daycare. My sister knew many of the parents at her son's daycare already, they live in the same neighbourhood. My nephew knew the children of those parents too. He had his little daycare friends before he started daycare at 18mo. My sister has lived in the same city all her life, some of the parents involved she's known for 30 years.

I'm not as close to my sister in law as I am my sister, but I know that when my niece started daycare they knew some kids and parents from the playground already.

It doesn't strike me as bizarre that someone would know people in their community who are in a similar life stage.


We did, yes. You either pick a daycare close to home or work, with the deciding factor being which daycare is better.


They got DMCAed today, August 28th.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: